[bisq-network/proposals] Implementation of protection tools: strengthening Account Age by requiring payments from 2 Bank Accounts (#93)

[Christoph Atteneder]

> The only way I can think of it is that accounts older than a certain date can always sign. Those old accounts would need to sign each other once they reach that specific age. Then the signing process for new users would develop as normal. Makes sense? Is it feasible?

Signing after a certain date for new markets might put us in a similar situation that if everyone knows this process a scammer could just create a fake account for each market now and wait. After signing is required he could start signing all his other new stolen accounts. He could go even that far to create multiple accounts for the same market, so he can use another one to sign if one gets detected.

> By special handling you mean that signed accounts would be signers if "account age < 1 march" instead of needing 90 days since signing? I would say yes, so they are able to immediately sign new users. Otherwise we would have to wait other 90 days to restore normal operation.

Yes, I meant exactly that.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/93#issuecomment-505846323
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190626/5f32757d/attachment.html>