[bisq-network/proposals] Removal of money orders (#75)

[Steve Jain]

> I am not in favor of removing MO's. One difficult dispute is not enough data to remove the payment method altogether.

> I think it might be better that it is grouped with F2F offers in some way as trades that can not be arbitrated.

I agree with these statements. Maybe we just need to make the risks of using money orders more clear, i.e., that people are on their own with money orders, just like they are with F2F.

Additionally: many of us are concerned about privacy, but what about the unbanked? A money order is the only practical way for Bisq to work for such people.

There are a million things that could go wrong with F2F, but that that didn't stop us from adding it. I don't like the idea of preemptively removing functionality out of hypothetical fear.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/75#issuecomment-473670304
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190317/002f4b31/attachment.html>