[bisq-network/bisq] Misc dao improvements (#2556)

[Manfred Karrer]

ManfredKarrer commented on this pull request.



> +     *
+     * @param currentValue      Current value
+     * @param newValue          New value
+     * @param min               Decrease of param value limited to current value / maxDecrease. If 0 we don't apply the check and any change is possible
+     * @param max               Increase of param value limited to current value * maxIncrease. If 0 we don't apply the check and any change is possible
+     * @return Validation result
+     */
+    @VisibleForTesting
+    static Result getChangeValidationResult(double currentValue, double newValue, double min, double max) {
+        checkArgument(min >= 0, "Min must be >= 0");
+        checkArgument(max >= 0, "Max must be >= 0");
+        if (currentValue == newValue)
+            return Result.SAME;
+
+        if (max == 0)
+            return Result.OK;

Yes that is not correct. Was a bit too lazy... Basically there is no use case for setting one to 0 and the other not. But should handle it correclty... The whole validation code could need more love...

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/2556#discussion_r267629835
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190320/e578ae83/attachment.html>