[bisq-network/proposals] Delay payout for Fiat trades if buyers account is fresh (#77)

[mpolavieja]

> It would have been the same in the previous concept

Yeah, that was a general comment for both the delay approach and this new alternative approach.  The attack I fear is that the scammer uses a several very low balance stolen accounts and spends a little BTC on each one of them through sell trades.  Those accounts get attested so then he can use those accounts to attest other stolen accounts with higher fiat balances by faking the payment confirmations.

> Note that the normal trade limits are still in place (1st month 0.0625 BTC, second 0.125, after 0.25) which is still rellative low and kept scammers out for 3 year

But we are not sure if it was the limits what kept them out, or if it was low liquidity.

In any case, IMO it is critical for the reputation system how users are going to achieve the status of being able to verify other users.  So we can be confident that the reputation system is trustworthy enough.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/77#issuecomment-489332040
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190504/87effd06/attachment.html>