[bisq-network/proposals] N-factor counterparty confidence mechanisms (#83)

Steve Jain notifications at github.com
Wed May 8 11:06:52 UTC 2019


> verification should always be done at payment account level

Agree. But I'm starting to think blocking could happen at the onion-address level...no need for users to put with a scammer's other bad accounts. Maybe the UI could suggest addresses to block in real-time based on signed payment accounts, and every software release could include an updated blacklist.

> CouldnĀ“t it be possible to store locally a whitelist of trusted payments accounts?

That's exactly what I'd like to see.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/83#issuecomment-490444692
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190508/b628a6d6/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list