[bisq-network/proposals] N-factor counterparty confidence mechanisms (#83)

Peter at Clearwater-Trust.com notifications at github.com
Wed May 8 22:04:56 UTC 2019

I agree, the seller should have an opportunity to vet the buyer before providing payment information (If they wish). I don't believe creating more programmatic obstacles is a good use of time. We already have the most valuable obstacle for fiat traders, The Security Fee. We will find an economic threshold that precludes petty scammers. It's imperative that we send the correct message to our fiat traders: "Fiat traders are welcome, the success of your trade is your responsibility. Bisq cannot protect you from the deficiencies of your fiat system."

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190508/39c13bed/attachment.html>

More information about the bisq-github mailing list