[bisq-network/proposals] N-factor counterparty confidence mechanisms (#83)

mpolavieja notifications at github.com
Thu May 9 07:54:42 UTC 2019


>**2FA**
 Does not help against ML with fake ID

I don´t want to sound naive, but I think 2FA could help at least a little bit against ML faked IDs.  It exposes the scammer a little bit more, and it forces him to do a little bit more of work such us finding 2 banks instead of just one that don´t ask too many questions and evidence about funds' origin (the latter makes it also a bit harder for bought IDs).

Taking @m52go idea of easiness for the honest user vs. scammer, a good key metric to assess the effectiveness of each protection tool is how easy it is for the honest user to overcome the protection challenge with respect on how easy/difficult it is for the scammer (in this case it looks to me very easy for the honest user and at least uncomfortable for the scammer).  

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/83#issuecomment-490793180
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190509/8b35a035/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list