[bisq-network/proposals] Proposed dev priorities (#91)

[Manfred Karrer]

>Perhaps we should also try to prioritize BitcoinJ 0.15 as well so it doesn't drag on either, since it appears to be ready. Just needs lots of testing - I can focus on that.

I reviewed it and looked all good to me, but would be good if someone else have a review as well (bitcoinJ repo) and yes it requires very good testing, specially also the DAO part. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/91#issuecomment-493035115
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190516/010bb7ae/attachment.html>