[bisq-network/proposals] Proposed dev priorities (#91)

Manfred Karrer notifications at github.com
Thu May 16 11:49:41 UTC 2019

>Perhaps we should also try to prioritize BitcoinJ 0.15 as well so it doesn't drag on either, since it appears to be ready. Just needs lots of testing - I can focus on that.

I reviewed it and looked all good to me, but would be good if someone else have a review as well (bitcoinJ repo) and yes it requires very good testing, specially also the DAO part. 

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190516/010bb7ae/attachment.html>

More information about the bisq-github mailing list