[bisq-network/proposals] Implementation of protection tools: strengthening Account Age by requiring payments from 2 Bank Accounts (#93)

FĂ©lix notifications at github.com
Wed May 22 09:49:44 UTC 2019

>Regarding the banning procedure, I think it should be implemented in any case. Now with arbitrators and in the future decentralized once arbitrators are gone.

I prefer decentralized solutions such as p2p blacklists to banning. However banning is simpler and as long as we have arbitrators it makes more sense. So I agree with banning for now.

However when arbitrators are gone it is too dangerous to have a **centralized authority** (DAO role?) with the power to ban users. It would be an obvious single point of attack for any regulator that wants to impose censorship.

It would also be dangerous to allow users to report/ban as this mechanism creates perverse incentives in a competitive market.

So long term we need to come up with something better. 

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190522/1934acee/attachment.html>

More information about the bisq-github mailing list