[bisq-network/proposals] Proposed dev priorities (#91)

[Félix]

@HarryMacfinned I agree with many of your concerns and thank you very much for stating them plainly.

> When I discuss about Bisq with some friends who trade, they always tell me that Bisq is already too complicated. And some of those guys are technical and should really imo be comfortable with Bisq.

This is something that I am specially worried about. Bisq is already too complicated, slow, etc. for _most_ potential users, which is already a small and technically-savvy population.

However I still believe that for the next 10 years the need for fiat-BTC exchange will dwarf the need for crypto-crypto and that if we manage to keep Bisq **uncensorable** it will have a huge market advantage in large parts of the world for a long time.

Also I think that you underestimate the risk of devoting resources to crypto-crypto market... only to see that market vanish completely when atomic swaps take off. The current XMR-BTC trade is actually just a handful of whales who could easily decide to go OTC.  


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/91#issuecomment-494755251
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190522/e0fa3d27/attachment-0001.html>