[bisq-network/proposals] Allow direct communication between traders (#90)

[Félix]

> could you please expand here on your concerns about implementing the chat you mentioned on #93?

Actually it was an example, not an objection.

> For example for #90 you can go to a lot of trouble to integrate direct chat... or just include a field for an e-mail address in the contract...

In this case since the chat mechanism is already built for arbitration, I don't have any problems with re-using it. However if we had to choose between building it from zero... or just adding a simple text field to include an e-mail address... well it's clear which solution is simpler.

In fact if you have ever used Revolut to trade on Bisq, when it was first included it allowed the use of an e-mail address and users often communicated directly. Now that Revolut works only with a phone number... users still whatsapp counterparties when there are any delays. So direct communication already exists in practice.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/90#issuecomment-494770624
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190522/ca4acd5d/attachment-0001.html>