[bisq-network/proposals] Implementation of protection tools: strengthening Account Age by requiring payments from 2 Bank Accounts (#93)

Craig Dayton notifications at github.com
Thu May 23 04:13:45 UTC 2019

My bank is very curious about my transactions using Zelle.  On just about every trade I'm get called asking what the transaction was for.  I have a dedicated bank that I only use for Bisq.  With the new account age process, it looks like I'll need to go shopping for another bank and payment type.  My fear is the bank(s) will get wise to what I'm doing and suspend the account.  If I have to establish a new bank account then, I'm back to square one with the accounting aging process.  I bet you can read my mind if this ever happens.

The bonding process sounds good to me. I'd more willing to put my BTC/BSQ at risk if I don't honestly complete the trade contract.  The bonding process would be less headache for the end user than that which is being proposed.

I'm finding it difficult to trust Bisq to be there when I need it to conduct trading.  There always some weird issue that comes up that is blocking for one reason another at the perfectly wrong time.  It is not always a Bisq issue that is getting in the way.  I'm just saying this so know my experience and that you don't forget to put on your customer shoes and look at the solution from a customer who wants to use Bisq for active trading (not Hodling).  Bisq is still the best P2P solution, it just needs to attractive more active traders.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190522/a50af2ee/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the bisq-github mailing list