[bisq-network/proposals] Implementation of protection tools: strengthening Account Age by requiring payments from 2 Bank Accounts (#93)

[mpolavieja]

> Our role should be to **build tools that allow users to protect themselves**. Not to be in charge of protecting them.

Ok, but we should be careful not to annoy users with too many options.  Users come to Bisq to trade not to figure out security.  As an example think about the simplicity of hardware wallets vs. the complexity of [glacier protocol](https://glacierprotocol.org/).  Because as for now Bisq is not only a protocol but also a front/end UI, we need to find a balance between "HW approach" and "Glacier approach" (i.e. a balance between UX and security).  

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/93#issuecomment-495122137
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190523/b1850849/attachment.html>