[bisq-network/proposals] Arbitration-free trading (#84)

[Mats-Erik Pistol]

This is a minimal change proposal so the BTC of the seller is locked as usual. 
I doubt blackmail will be a problem in practise, and if it starts to arise the sellers will require a higher security deposit of the buyers. A sufficiently high security deposit for the buyer will make it worse to be a buyer (buyer pays, seller starts to blackmail for more fiat before releasing). 
It is thus so helpful if the takers could see, at least roughly, how high the maker-buyers security deposit is. Maybe with a some type of quantitative indicator or a set of stars. This indicates the degree of commitment of the buyer.

I don't think the DAO community realises how fragile the arbitration system is. There are now two arbitrators. If they quit, who will find the next trusted arbitrators?





-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/84#issuecomment-496153383
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190527/12cb887b/attachment.html>