[bisq-network/proposals] Distributed reputation system (#78)

mpolavieja notifications at github.com
Tue May 28 21:32:09 UTC 2019


Hi @reipichu, I think that most of us in the community think that BSQ bonding will be the best solution.   The problem is that if requiring to own some BTC in order to onboard Bisq is a barrier of entry, requiring BSQ would raise the barrier of entry even more.

Furthermore, BSQ token still needs to mature, and we need a solution in the meantime.

Proposal #93 is a more concrete approach to strengthen account age as a trust parameter.  In that proposal it wouldn't be that easy  for a scammer to fake a fiat payment.   The real root of trust in this proposal and also in #93 is not really arbitrators but old users. 

In #93 it is also suggested to put the first stones to pave the way for an arbitration-less protocol by enabling direct communication between users.    And once arbitrators are gone,  a decentralized blacklisting system can be implemented (we already have a rather solid conceptual design), which will be needed anyway regardless of the protocol (BSQ bonding included). 

I think we should focus on the priorities set at #91.  What you propose is indeed excellent input for priority number 3, but we all need to make a decision first about priorities 1 and 2. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/78#issuecomment-496698047
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190528/bef40b37/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list