[bisq-network/proposals] Bisq v2 (#118)

[ExPrgrmmr]

> In a proposal for Bisq 2 a major change in the trading protocol is suggested with having BSQ bonds paid by traders.
> 
> The DAO/BSQ concept is already too complex for an average Bitcoin holder. And for now it is coherently optional to buy BSQ, hence holding stakes.
> 
> If mandatory BSQ bonds is added users are forced into DAO, giving a much higher threshold to start and continue using Bisq, with likely undesirable impact on exchange liquidity (including fees).
> 
> It is good the DAO module is optional to use now. A complete non-contributor can preferable disable it and get huge improvement in app performance.
> 
> Keeping things simple and optional by not enforcing indirect contribution with BSQ bonds (or BSQ fees) is a more future-proof approach imo.

https://bisq.community/t/bisq-version-2-implications/8638

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/118#issuecomment-548879572
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191101/80845a5e/attachment-0001.html>