[bisq-network/proposals] Send arbitration funds to a burning address instead of BTC donation address. (#135)

[chimp1984]

I think there is no realistic risk for that case because if there are repeated cases and specially if it is the same trader the arbitrator will become suspicious and he can delay the payout as well. The human element and time delay works in our favor. I think the loss of funds (BSQ reimbursed but the BTC are gone) is a bigger problem that this "theoretical" risk. We could also increase the required bond.
Also keep in mind that those roles, specially those where there is only one are not 100% based on bond only but also on reputation. If the current address owner works correctly and earns BSQ by his work there is little risk IMO. Also the BSQ purchases should be done frequently and at least if the balance is > 50% of the bond. So any abuse can be observed realtively fast.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/135#issuecomment-550521839
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191106/48cf5282/attachment.html>