[bisq-network/proposals] Send arbitration funds to a burning address instead of BTC donation address. (#135)

MwithM notifications at github.com
Thu Nov 7 06:54:54 UTC 2019


Arbitration cases are meant to be rare, so I don't think that this proposal is going to cost that much. The only reason to have a lot of disputes going to arbitration is this attack, and this would bee too expensive indeed, it would suppose the end of Bisq.
Timelocks could be removed or set up for them longer periods. A month to trigger arbitration would assure that only real disputes end into arbitration, and not technical problems.
Arbitration now could have a higher cost for traders, considering that it's a cost for the DAO.

When I voted for this role, I assumed that the person in charge of the role was completely anonymous and the locked bond would protect Bisq from misbehaviour. Now I have to trust the address owner while I havent read anywhere that this person is not completely anonymous and should be trusted.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/135#issuecomment-550919624
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191106/1e6afb57/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list