[bisq-network/proposals] Send arbitration funds to a burning address instead of BTC donation address. (#135)

[sqrrm]

@bodymindarts True, maybe the assumption that most offers lead to trades is wrong and we should stop publishing this data since it's giving away more data than necessary. It's a balance but I would keep it as is for now.

@flix1 there is already the rule that the donation address holder shall buy BSQ for the funds, not sure at what percentage or if set to a percentage.

As discussed during today's call, I think the multisig donation address is better than adding more donation addresses. An attacker could still filter through all the offers and take those that are using their address. It's a lower take but still a severe attack. I like the 3of4 multisig with 2 known contributors and two unknown as key-holders. That will make it harder to put pressure on either known contributors or for the unknown ones to abscond with the funds.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/135#issuecomment-551247909
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191107/8e66d4e4/attachment.html>