[bisq-network/proposals] Investigate alternative implementation for bisq (as basis for V2 / off-chain trading) (#125)

ExPrgrmmr notifications at github.com
Mon Nov 11 07:51:06 UTC 2019


> The only way I can think of using LN is having a very good reputation system without security deposits:
> 
> 1. The seller would only accept fiat from fully signed accounts (a minimum of reputation).
> 2. The seller sends the BTC only after receiving the fiat.  This could be done in small chunks to reduce risk for the buyer (this process of chunking the trade would be fast with revolut or instant SEPA).
> 
> In any case, this could always be improved with a small BSQ bond on the side of the seller to at least cover each chunk.
> 
> (this was a very quick and dirty comment, so I am sure it has plenty of errors)

Maybe then you can rewrite my LN proposal above that you rejected?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/125#issuecomment-552331408
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191110/c1175d3f/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list