[bisq-network/proposals] Send arbitration funds to a burning address instead of BTC donation address. (#135)

[mpolavieja]

The winning party will receive part of the security deposit depending on the mediator proposed payout.  In my opinion the mediator should leave part of the security deposits as a fee for the arbitrator, which is going to bear the risk of paying the winning party and wait to later be reimbursed in the equivalent amount of BSQ by the DAO.

In older versions, arbitrator earned also a fee, they did not work for free.  In this version, the arbitrator is actually more a trader than an arbitrator.  He buys the dispute at a slight discount.   Users don´t have to worry about this.  The only thing they see is that they are getting the BTC payout suggested by the mediator.

Regarding your concern about the BTC from the arbitrator coming from strange actitivities,  again  I don´t see the difference of getting the BTC from the seller if you are the buyer and won the dispute. 
Why would you assume that the BTCs from the seller (or from the buyer´s security deposit) are more legit than the BTC sent by the arbitrator?   Why would you assume that the arbitrator thinks that the BTC from the traders are more legit than his?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/135#issuecomment-552901949
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191112/35af7d8a/attachment.html>