[bisq-network/bisq] Update contributing.md (#3613)

[erciccione]

> I don't have the feeling so far that on PRs that were around for longer more contributors are starting to review them, did you? 

That's absolutely not the point. The fact that people don't do it shouldn't exclude the fact that *they should have the possibility to do it*, but it's clear that Bisq maintainers don't see it that way.

> Do you have the feeling this change of workflow needs discussion by the broader developer community

I think would be a start to just not ignore a comment (i consider "ignoring" answering and then merging anyway at the same time, in a timeframe of few hours), if rised.

> or did you mainly want to point out PRs in the Bisq repo are merged too quickly in general?

Also, yes. Bisq seems to have workflows more suited for a company than an open source project and this discussion makes it very clear to me.

> We do have more the problem atm

"We have other problems" and "there is more important stuff" is [the answer i get every time](https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/dkhrb6/skepticism_sunday_october_20_2019/f4y6iwv/) i rise a concern about Bisq's development structure. Very depressing.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/3613#issuecomment-554385469
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191115/c8507bae/attachment.html>