[bisq-network/bisq] Wrong version number in 1.2.4 release branch (#3707)

Julian Knutsen notifications at github.com
Wed Nov 27 22:47:05 UTC 2019


<!--
   SUPPORT REQUESTS: This is for reporting bugs in the Bisq app.
   If you have a support request, please join #support on Bisq's
   Keybase team at https://keybase.io/team/Bisq
-->

### Description

Text show v1.2.3

#### Version

548a21775

### Steps to reproduce

* Build tip of release/v1.2.4
* Look at version string

### Expected behaviour

v1.2.4

### Actual behaviour

v1.2.3

### Screenshots

![version](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8082291/69764209-69381780-1124-11ea-8920-e213f0540f49.JPG)
#### Device or machine

N/A

#### Additional info

Version strings can be tricky if we have users building from master and they submit bug reports. Would it make sense to only set version numbers in release branches and have the version on master be `development` or something like that?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/3707
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191127/fa991d7c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list