[bisq-network/compensation] [WIP] For Cycle 8 (#416)

[Riccardo Masutti]

> I would suggest you to slow down. I appreciate your initiative and go-for-it approach, and realize every contributor will have their own style of doing things, so take this as constructive advice.
> 
> 1. Reviews are typically done by people with at least a handful of merged contributions, otherwise it's hard to attribute any significance to the reviews.
> 2. A number of items you listed above haven't been merged yet. [At least one item wasn't even performed](https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-website/pull/279) as claimed on this compensation request. And none of your reviews have included any comments, even on ones that have generated discussion like [this one](https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-website/pull/280). And on what basis did you approve [these changes](https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/3681) to the Bisq software itself? It could be that you're planning to review the items you've listed before the end of the cycle, but as it stands, the impression you're giving is that you're stacking contributions to get as fat a paycheck as possible.
> 3. The roles you listed are not roles. [These are roles](https://github.com/bisq-network/roles/issues). It's fine do that stuff (i.e., create new accounts and venues for discussing Bisq) but it's premature to count them as roles performed.
> 
> I highly recommend that you consider discussing your ideas and goals with other contributors first. Are you on Keybase? I don't recognize your handle (not sure if you go by another one elsewhere).
> 
> This would help make your work more broadly accepted. For example, why start a whole new Keybase team for Italian, instead of simply creating a new channel on the existing Keybase team? Is your approach wrong? Not necessarily. But not discussing something potentially controversial and then asking to be paid for it is not a good approach.

Hi @m52go , I didn't know that code reviews are done only by reputable sources.  I read differently [here](https://docs.bisq.network/contributor-checklist.html).

About my reviews, it wasn't a try to get a big paycheck, exactly the opposite. I will not request anything for those reviews as there's no content, fixes or suggestions, but just simple approvals. In my opinion were ready.

About newly created social accounts, I did by reading your comment here: https://github.com/bisq-network/growth/issues/142#issuecomment-532192309

And by following @MwithM.
I saw him managing spanish Twitter account and then I realized there was a lot of foreign accounts like FR, PT, BR, etc.
I did the same for Telegram and Keybase.

Why?

Because here in Italy there's a huge informational gap about Bisq and decentralized networks/exchanges so I though it would be a great idea to launch italian channels to give support in italian.

Not only that, I will personally translate the entire website, software and subtitles in italian.
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-website/issues/173

What I want to show by doing this is that in Italy there is a great interest and need for Bisq.

Ps: I requested italian language project on Transifex to both subtitles and website.
I'm already working hard on software and should be ready and reviewed in 1-2 weeks.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/416#issuecomment-559632442
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191128/5dd3b14f/attachment.html>