[bisq-network/compensation] [WIP] For Cycle 8 (#416)

[Riccardo Masutti]

> Great to hear @RiccardoMasutti, and I didn't mean to accuse. Maybe it was just a matter of first impressions that didn't look right.
> 
> As you'll see in the doc you linked, it also says:
> 
> > With that said, it’s a good idea to consult with stakeholders via Slack, GitHub, the mailing list, or other communication channels before setting out on any serious contribution effort.
> 
> Typically people use GitHub and Keybase (formerly Slack) to introduce themselves and keep people informed of in-progress and upcoming work, and compensation requests are the final result of a cycle's work. It seems like you did the opposite, and used the compensation request as a way to communicate your in-progress work instead.
> 
> I guess that's not a bad thing, but like I said above, without having ever interacted with you before, it seemed strange to me.
> 
> Thanks for your work so far. I encourage you to consider making GitHub issues and being more active on Keybase to send people signals of what you're up to, instead of relying on your compensation requests.

I will do it from today.

I believe I will also propose significant changes to the structure of the documents.

I have found it very difficult to find this kind of information too, because they are scattered ...

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/416#issuecomment-559682607
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191128/a19d0913/attachment.html>