[bisq-network/proposals] Investigate alternative implementation for bisq (as basis for V2 / off-chain trading) (#125)

sqrrm notifications at github.com
Sun Oct 6 21:28:51 UTC 2019


I don't see the benefit of rewriting for the sake of rewriting. It might be that rust is a better language for some reason or other, and there is indeed a lot of support in the Bitcoin community. We are however tied to using java for at least the DAO as you mention. Throwing out all the other java code and start from scratch would also mean we still need an interface to the DAO, and all the current developers that are not used to rust would have to learn a new language, or they might leave.

What might make more sense is to define the v2 protocol strictly and allow for different clients using something like a `bisqd` with the api. Still, we first need to know what v2 entails as @mpolavieja mentions.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/125#issuecomment-538789863
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191006/17ae38d8/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list