[bisq-network/proposals] Investigate alternative implementation for bisq (as basis for V2 / off-chain trading) (#125)
notifications at github.com
Mon Oct 7 03:41:46 UTC 2019
> I don't see the benefit of rewriting for the sake of rewriting.
Completely agree. I'm proposing a rewrite for the sake of:
And only based on the assumption that the overlap between v1 and v2 is not very large / easy to re-implement. ie. it will be a hard-fork with completely new code for handling trading - which means a rewrite of some portion of the code anyway.
> What might make more sense is to define the v2 protocol strictly and allow for different clients using something like a `bisqd` with the api.
A well defined protocol contract for `v2` would certainly be good.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bisq-github