[bisq-network/proposals] Investigate alternative implementation for bisq (as basis for V2 / off-chain trading) (#125)

[Alexey Zagarin]

> I don't see how Bisq compares to Ethereum or the Ethereum DAO.

Bisq itself doesn't compare of course. Bailing out investors does.

> > Bitcoin has several implementations besides Bitcoin Core, this includes libbitcoin, ABCore and btcd to name a few.
> 
> And none is used for mining as those who have skin in the game dont play risky games.

You misunderstand what SITG is. And how mining is relevant here? They just have a different scope (validating nodes)l. Any venture incurs risks, especially in the space of Bitcoin. You can't make trading absolutely safe (that's what governments always do by "protecting" investors... and always fail – but Bisq is supposed to free us of government supervision, isn't it?) People will always lose money due to different reasons, you can't prevent this with technology. You can only mitigate some of the risks. But different people have different needs and different risk tolerance, why do you feel that you can decide for them?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/125#issuecomment-539321167
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191007/4631d803/attachment.html>