[bisq-network/proposals] New trade protocol (#52)

[Peter at Clearwater-Trust.com]

### Creating a hierarchical support structure: Mediators and Arbitrators.

The problem with hierarchical support structures is that arbitrators will be compensated more, even-though mediators have more contact with the customer and have the same knowledge and skill. 

**Creating this kind of “bureaucracy is probably necessary?” But is it?**

The Arbitrator’s knowledge and skill can be substituted with a Mediator’s knowledge and skill without disruption. So this is a paid position of power. That doesn’t sound cool to me.

Bisq creates opportunity for real DAO employment. This is clearly the future. 

### What is the driving force to create Mediator/Arbitrator derision? 

Why not have all Mediators or all Arbitrators?
Corporate/legal reasons not allowed or accepted. 

**We cannot allow discussions of law practice influence the innovation of the platform.** 

If we decide to split the work they should be compensated the same?

If you say compensation should be different, why do you think it should be different?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/52#issuecomment-541085726
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191011/2eb8f86c/attachment.html>