[bisq-network/bisq-docs] Refine rules and dispute resolution (#167)

Christoph Atteneder notifications at github.com
Thu Oct 24 09:32:51 UTC 2019


I'm not sure if we have to mention this additionally, but we not only have the case where the Seller is a signer who could sign the Buyers account. There is also the case where the Buyer has a verified account and the Sellers account is signed after a successful trade as well. There is no extra warning in the app as there is no specific risk for both sides that the signing takes place.

> If the arbitrator sides with you, they will personally reimburse you (and probably take a small fee for their effort).

probably take a small fee sounds a little bit vague to me as a user. Although we say small fee it sounds like there is no limit to it. The fee probably is depending on who complicated the dispute resolution will be. Maybe we could think about limiting the fee somehow? (Max. the deposit of the loosing trading peer, or if there was just a technical error it could be a max percentage of the deposit). We haven't talked about this in much detail yet, but I'm not sure if should leave it as it is right now? @ManfredKarrer @sqrrm what do you think?

> Once a mediator or arbitrator has gathered enough evidence to make a decision, they will either suggest a payout (in the case of a mediator) or publish a new payout transaction (in the case of an arbitrator) from the 2-of-3 multisig deposit according to their findings.

There is still the 2-of-3 multisig deposit which won't exist anymore with 1.2.0

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-docs/pull/167#issuecomment-545833816
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191024/a4b407b6/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list