[bisq-network/bisq] [1.2.0] Update informational prompt upon creating fiat account with account signing details (#3446)

[Steve Jain]

Suggestion:

```
payment.limits.info=To limit chargeback risk, Bisq sets per-trade limits based on the following 2 factors:\n\
  \n\
  1. General chargeback risk for the payment method\n\
  2. Account signing status\n\
  \n\
  This payment account you just created carries some chargeback risk and is not yet signed by an arbitrator or trusted peer, \
  so it is limited to buying or selling 0.01 BTC per trade.\
  After it is signed, limits will increase as follows:\n\
  \n\
  ● Before signing, and 30 days after signing, your per-trade limit will be {0}\n\
  ● 30 days after signing, your per-trade limit will be {1}\n\
  ● 60 days after signing, your per-trade limit will be {2}\n\
  \n\
  More information is at https://docs.bisq.network/payment-methods#account-signing.\n\
  \n\
  There are no limits on the number of trades you can make.
```

@ripcurlx you mentioned [here](https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-docs/pull/167#issuecomment-545833816) that signed buyers can sign sellers' payment accounts too. Does this serve the same purpose as signed sellers signing buyers' payment accounts? Can an untrusted seller have their limits raised by selling BTC to a trusted buyer?

Note that the variables in the string above may have changed (e.g., {0} definitely has).

I assume this issue is a more general version of #3457.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/3446#issuecomment-546242472
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191025/915be398/attachment.html>