[bisq-network/bisq-docs] Refine rules and dispute resolution (#167)

[Christoph Atteneder]

> If a user wins a payout case with an arbitrator, they've been found to not be at fault, so it seems strange to punish them. The guilty party is the one who should be charged...and their funds are inherent in the BSQ supply from which the arbitrator is getting reimbursed.

If we have a guilty party than the fee can come from it's deposit. But if we have not guilty party, but a technical problem than there is no-one to be punished. So I do agree for the transitional phase until we have fixed the technical problems that we don't charge the users for arbitration. But that is just my personal opinion.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-docs/pull/167#issuecomment-547526425
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20191029/3f82f519/attachment-0001.html>