[bisq-network/proposals] Bisq v2 (#118)

[battleofwizards]

> With BSQ it goes back to stakeholders

Yes, that is a very good point and very nice property to have (a symmetry of burned vs reimbursed).

Although from an outsider perspective this will look like we force buying and hodling BSQ onto users (which is arguably suboptimal to hodling BTC). I'm afraid that never mind how good is our justification the question "why can't I bond with BTC" will pop up over and over again. I'm worried that even the Bitcoin OGs may not have the inclination to understand and defend the BSQ position.

Tricky!

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/118#issuecomment-530248718
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190910/d3a5ad5d/attachment.html>