[bisq-network/proposals] Decide on interest rate for BSQ bonds of bonded roles (#120)

chimp1984 notifications at github.com
Fri Sep 13 16:38:03 UTC 2019


@wiz 
> Is this already implemented in the DAO ? If not, I don't think it's worth the risk of hard-forking the DAO to add such a feature. 

It was not intended to make that automatic, but just to find a consensus what is a fair compensation for bonded BSQ so that all use the same calculation based on their bond value.

I think there is a confusion triggered by the term "interest rate".

All I suggest is to find a conesensus what bond holders should request as compensation for the service to be willing to lock up BSQ (and having the risk to get confiacated as well to be not able to react on volatility for trading). 
As noted, there are some roles where basically no effort is done (domain holder, dns,...) and beside that it would be good to have it transparent how much of a compensation for a normal role is for the bond.

E.g. a seed node operator might spend 80 EUR for hosting costs. He might take 100 EUR for his service to maintain and operate the node. He has to lockup 10 000 BSQ and he wants to get some compenastion for that as well. If we do not agree on a consensus, operator A might charge 10 BSQ and operator B might charge 100 BSQ which would trigger discussions.... 
Btw. hosting costs should be aligned as well so that there is not huge differences (but some differences are ok) - but that is another topic....   

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/120#issuecomment-531307565
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190913/7189c99c/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list