[bisq-network/proposals] Decide on compensation per BSQ for loked up bonds (#120)

[MwithM]

There's risk involving the tasks you are responsible for, which is different between roles and then there's risk involving cost of oportunity of locked funds and being "forced" to leave  funds in a new and possibly volatile asset. This kind of risk is the same for all those who have their funds locked in bonds, even though they might estimate it in a different way because there might be contributors who feel more or less confident on the future of BSQ.
I think that removing "interest rate" from the subject of this issue is correct, we just need to find a price for locked bonds. It's normal we don't find a price easily because we need to look to the future to value risks and possible value of this project, and there's not many locked bonds already to compare between different roles. 
Claiming a compensation request is a good way to pay to those willing to risk their funds, as funds are substracted from the DAO in form of inflation.
For the future, if there are ennough trusted contributors interested, maybe we could stablish a periodical auction for bonding price to fulfill the roles needed by the DAO.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/120#issuecomment-531313831
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190913/73916074/attachment.html>