[bisq-network/proposals] Bisq v2 (#118)

[Félix]

My concern about bonding and DAO confication of the bonds is that it is not very scalable. Imagine having 1 million users and 0.1% of them being scammers... 1000 scammers could create 1000s of conflicts a month... would we need a DAO confiscation vote for each? It culd easily turn into a DDOS attack vector.

With a pure Mutually-Assured-Destruction 2-of-2 multisig protocol you could have bonds (in BSQ or BTC) without the need for the DAO to intervene. 

I believe that with:

-2-of-2 multisig security deposit (up to 110% of trade amount)
-Mediation
-Web-of-trust (identity-less reputation)
-Account age filters

You could have a safer, more scalable system which also requires less radical changes to Bisq... 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/118#issuecomment-531740659
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190916/12df37e7/attachment.html>