[bisq-network/proposals] Bisq v2 (#118)

[mpolavieja]

> DAO confiscation of the bonds is that it is not very scalable

Agree on that, but probably the risk of losing the bond would discourage scammers from such DDoS attack.  I am more concerned about legal liability of BSQ holders, as it is almost certain that in the case of legal conflict the Bisq DAO will never be considered a limited liability entity in most jurisdictions, so the BSQ holders would be directly liable....  This is quite disturbing.

Maybe a fee structure like the following would ensure that the DAO almost never has to decide on trade reimbursments?:

- Cheapest (Default): 2of2 multisig without mediator and without DAO recourse
- Medium: 2of2 multisig with mediator and without DAO recourse
- Expensive: 2of2 multisig with mediator and DAO recourse.  Only available for trades greater than X BTC.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/118#issuecomment-531763727
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190916/7ac3f0c2/attachment.html>