[bisq-network/compensation] For Cycle 5 (#358)

[erciccione]

Just for the records @MwithM the proposal was accepted. There were 2 opened because for some bug the DAO didn't remove the old one, which was correctly rejected. The correct one was approved.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/358#issuecomment-531827424
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190916/c2406448/attachment.html>