[bisq-network/proposals] Decide on compensation per BSQ for locked up for bonded roles (#120)

[Steve Jain]

Another way of thinking of locked-up bond is that it's a commitment to consistently do some quantity of non-deliverable work, as the bond is confiscated if this work isn't done. 

Whether this compensation is calculated as a percentage of locked bond, or as a nominal BSQ amount per role based on estimated monthly commitment...that seems to be the main question here.

**Upsides/downsides**

_Percentage of bond_
Ongoing compensation will not relate to effort. For example, Slack admin and seednode operators both post 20 000 BSQ bonds, but Slack requires very little work (if any) on a regular basis.

_Estimated monthly commitment_
Compensation is more closely tied to performed work, but it's not related to posted bond. Domain name roles lose out here, for example, but I would expect the network to be willing to make reasonable exceptions for such cases.

The second case seems to be more favored here, of course, but I wanted to articulate this to show that the first case shouldn't seem too far from the second one.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/120#issuecomment-531853385
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190916/12b8d9a3/attachment-0001.html>