[bisq-network/bisq] Fulfilling Proposal #110 (#3275)

[niyid]

> > I prefer **`com.google.code.gson`** but I can attest to the fact that **`com.fasterxml.jackson.core`** was already in use in the Bisq **`core`** project.
> 
> Yes, and that is enough of a problem. BTW, up until recently we had 3 libs for the same purpose: `gson`, `jakcson`, and `json-simple`.

@battleofwizards 

Are you aware of any performance matrix across these libraries? I like the "faster" in **`com.fasterxml.jackson.core`** but I would really want to know how it compares with **`com.google.code.gson`**.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/3275#issuecomment-533668400
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190920/cce69c3f/attachment-0001.html>