[bisq-network/proposals] New trade protocol (#52)

[sqrrm]

@mpolavieja Good point, just reverting to the original state will at least cover the case of the non responsive buyer. Both are then ok with the BTC going back to the seller (assuming the buyer didn't send any fiat). I think it can work as an extra protection for sellers.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/52#issuecomment-535209353
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190925/edc26b87/attachment.html>