[bisq-network/proposals] Implementation of protection tools: strengthening Account Age by requiring payments from 2 Bank Accounts (#93)

sqrrm notifications at github.com
Mon Sep 30 14:51:34 UTC 2019


@m52go @mpolavieja Currently we have the account signing by arbitrators/counterparties implemented. I suggest we leave 2FA for a later release as we want to get something live as soon as possible to allow for proper fiat trading again.

The limits haven't really been settled from what I can see. What I did so far is:

**Any seller and buyers with accounts that are not high risk (low liquidity currencies):**
- Unsigned: 0.0625 BTC
- Signed less than month ago: 0.0625 BTC
- Signed more than a month ago: 0.125 BTC
- Signed more than two months ago: 0.25 BTC

**Buyers with high risk accounts:**
- Unsigned: 0.01 BTC
- Signed less than month ago: 0.01 BTC
- Signed more than a month ago: 0.0625 BTC
- Signed more than two months ago: 0.25 BTC

I think counting time from signing is reasonable. We can change the limits but we should do it now before release or it might cause quite a bad user experience if we do it later. The reason for the asymmetry regarding buyers and sellers of high risk accounts is to keep what we currently have and not lower any limits.

Accounts will be able to sign others two months after getting signed.

Arbitrators will sign accounts created before March 1 2019 to act as root accounts for signing. Accounts signed by arbitrators will be able to sign others from day one.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/93#issuecomment-536598366
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190930/44ea1e8f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list