[bisq-network/proposals] Reimbursement for trade WTZETDH (#254)

ifarnung notifications at github.com
Mon Aug 24 18:58:08 UTC 2020


I think ncstdc makes a valid argument, and should likely have received some portion of the non-performing trader's security deposit.
HOWEVER, the deposit was **.006** not ,06 BTC so this needs to be modified to be properly evaluated by the contributors.
@ncstdc Please correct this before submitting to the DAO.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/254#issuecomment-679305949
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200824/cbd28ade/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list