[bisq-network/support] Dispute mediator/arbitrator payout on trade WTZETDH (#486)

[m52go]

@Bisq-knight appreciate your feedback and offer to make @ncstdc whole. Whether or not this proposal is approved would appear to set a precedent for the level of mediator skin-in-the-game going forward.

For this particular case I think [leo816 summarized everything](https://github.com/bisq-network/support/issues/486#issuecomment-679351626) quite well above.

> The enemy is not the other trader, it is the bank.

I disagree. Of course this is a generally true statement, most of the time. But I don't think it should apply to Bisq trades. As mentioned above, bank issues are unprovable. As bad as banking systems are, they _usually_ work. The outcome of accommodating bank issues is probably going to be...more bank issues suddenly popping up. 

Buyers need to use payment methods that work well for them, they need to be aware of their sending limits, etc. I think making carve-outs that take buyers off the hook in case of bank issues is a slippery slope that will degrade the trading experience.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/support/issues/486#issuecomment-683069771
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200828/4836ed7c/attachment.html>