[bisq-network/support] Fee reimbursement for trade eAkES [WIP] (#482)

sqrrm notifications at github.com
Sat Aug 29 14:27:39 UTC 2020


Cases that have to be taken to the DAO should not get the deposit from the other party paid out to them in my opinion. The cost to the DAO of doing the refund is already high and rewarding extra funds to the aggrieved party could act as an incentive to take cases to the DAO. While I understand that the aggrieved party doesn't feel good about having to wait so long to get their funds back, it's a matter of building a healthy Bisq as a whole.

I will still vote approval for this case, but going forward I don't think it's the right thing for the DAO.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/support/issues/482#issuecomment-683298259
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200829/23881006/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list