[bisq-network/bisq] What new payment methods would you like added to Bisq? (#4757)

pazza notifications at github.com
Sat Dec 12 01:47:03 CET 2020


Hi @LeadManPL thanks for the feedback.

> I believe adding too much payment options will decrease liquidity, There should be only major options available. 

I disagree:

- More options mean more accessibility.
- More accessibility means increased liquidity.

On the Bisq channel in Telegram now there is a trader wanting to access Bisq in Iran. They will be restricted from doing so due to limited payment methods.

What abut traders in Colombia that are keen to trade on Bisq using new EMI providers recently set up in their country. They too are restricted from trading.

> because of the diversity of options, it will be harder for users to match their payment options.

What would make it harder to match options?

Why would they not just 'filter by payment type?'

![filter](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/66367547/101967544-d8d75280-3c12-11eb-94b7-101e7d1c8f5f.png)

>**And whats more important, there should be possibility for makers to accept multi payments for each offer.**

I agree this is important.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/4757#issuecomment-743533146
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20201211/a9427be8/attachment.htm>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list