[bisq-network/bisq] Add option to make trade 'reason' less obvious (#2869)

[pazza]

Hi @Conza88 thanks for the feedback. 

> Sure. And same with vice versa (seller)?

Yes, it would be the same. Think it should be maker/taker only. If it was maker and taker you would get 2 alterative options and it would get confusing.

> I'd like an "(i)" that when hovered over indicates why, it's purpose. 

Yes, I think it would be important to offer some more info to the reason.

> I guess if maker of BTC sale put in e.g. "gun sale" and in my country that's illegal to own, that could cause issues - in which case, you'd just not do it...

Yes, counterparty could always ignore their peer's suggestion, this would always be acceptable. 

Do you think it should be maker or taker that sets the alternative Trade ID? I am leaning towards taker as they can then learn which traders will include their suggestion and use this knowledge when taking future offers.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/2869#issuecomment-745016910
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20201214/31b5b47c/attachment.htm>