[bisq-network/compensation] For Cycle 10 (#477)

[burningman2]

@cbeams Sure I agree to dropping it. 

I am ok to drop it completely (not adding to cycle 11) as most other bonded role owners have not requested a compensation for that as well. 

I think long-term we should compensate for a role as the involved work for roles are not always covering that. But as the economic situation is forcing Bisq to cut expenses I think it might be best to postpone that until Bisq reaches "break even" over serveral cycles and enters sustainibility terrain.  

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/477#issuecomment-584900750
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200211/b529a02b/attachment.html>