[bisq-network/compensation] For Cycle 10 (#477)

[Chris Beams]

@burningman2 wrote:
> Made a new DAO compensation request

Thanks. In the future, per https://github.com/orgs/bisq-network/teams/dao/discussions/2, please hold off on submitting your DAO proposal until team lead review is complete. It'll avoid this kind of rework.

@sqrrm wrote:
> I feel it's wrong to drop the request for compensation for putting up a bond.

I agree, and it's why I really did mean _defer_ here. I simply want to be conservative with green-lighting anything like this until we have a clear and consistent policy about it. As mentioned, I'm making it a priority to have this done for Cycle 11. Thanks for saying so in any case.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/477#issuecomment-585055365
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200211/bd7ce329/attachment.html>