[bisq-network/proposals] Implement budgeting and improve reporting (#158)

[Steve Jain]

> Another possibility is to calulate total BSQ burned in the last 4 cycles and not exceed this amount divided by 4 on the next cycle, in a similar way we are calculating BSQ/USD rate for compensation requests. Reading again the proposal, I guess this option, or a similar one, is what @m52go means by backward looking.

@MwithM yes this is what I had in mind, but I was only thinking of the short-term (i.e., use last cycle's burn to predict next cycle's issuance). Your suggestion about using an average might better.

---

I suggest we aim to get basic elements of this proposal figured out and implemented before the end of Cycle 9 in case any proposals need to be made, so that they can be implemented at the start of Cycle 10.

Cycle 9 will end in about 2 weeks from now, and Cycle 10 will begin in about 3 weeks from now.

Maybe we can have a call next week to discuss the basic mechanism proposed here, budget numbers, and any other concerns.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/158#issuecomment-570281845
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200102/00d1caff/attachment.html>